2. Although the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case, the court below had the 11th same career in consideration of all the circumstances, the court below was imposed a punishment, and there was no change of circumstances that may differ from the original court's punishment. The scope of recommendation on the sentencing guidelines for the defendant is from October to 2, and even according to it, it cannot be deemed that the original court's punishment is particularly heavy, and the defendant's age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, and circumstances after the crime, etc. are comprehensively taken into account, the sentence of the court below is judged to be appropriate, and the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.