화학물질관리법위반(환각물질흡입)
The appeal is dismissed.
The grounds of appeal are examined.
Based on its stated reasoning, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged (excluding the part not guilty of the order).
The judgment below
Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and the evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the rules of reinforcement of confession.
According to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years is imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing
In this case where a more minor sentence is imposed on the defendant, the argument that the punishment is too unreasonable is not a legitimate ground for appeal.
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.