A. Of the real estate listed in the attached list No. 1 of the attached list, the attached appraisal is indicated as “A”.

A. On October 10, 2013, the Plaintiff acquired ownership of B forest land B 10860 square meters and C forest land 972 square meters, respectively.

On July 15, 2014, the forest land B was divided into real estate listed in paragraph (1) of the attached Table No. 1 (hereinafter “instant land”); real estate listed in paragraph (3) of the attached Table No. 3 (hereinafter “instant land”); and D forest land No. 142 square meters; and the forest land C was subdivided into real estate listed in paragraph (2) of the attached Table No. 2 of the attached Table No. 1 (hereinafter “instant land”); and real estate listed in paragraph (4) of the attached Table No. 4 (hereinafter “instant land”) on July 15, 2014.

(hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant lands” in total of the instant land 1 through 4

Before the Plaintiff acquired ownership of each of the instant land, the Defendant installed a 86 square meters in the attached Form No. 1 among the instant land, a traffic sign 86 square meters in the attached Form No. 1, a traffic sign 90 square meters in the same appraisal map, a traffic sign 69 square meters in the same appraisal map, and a traffic sign 50 square meters in the same traffic sign, a traffic sign 50 square meters in the same appraisal map. The same appraisal shall also be 19 square meters in the part of “Ma”, a 13 square meters in the attached Form No. 2 in the instant land, and a 13 square meters in the attached Form No. 3 in the attached Form No. 3, and an appraisal net in the attached Form No. 4 in the instant land (hereinafter “the instant military facility”) with each of the instant military facilities up to time.

C. Meanwhile, the amount equivalent to the rent from October 10, 2013 to April 9, 2015 for each of the instant land is KRW 22,530,414, and the amount equivalent to the rent for each of the instant land is KRW 1,243,843, around and after the closing date of the instant argument.

[Ground of recognition] The absence of dispute, entry and video of Gap 1, 2, and 4 through 7 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the result of the request for surveying and appraisal to the Director of the Gyeonggi-do Headquarters of the Korea Cadastral Corporation, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

(a)decisions on removal and requests for extradition;