2. The judgment appears to have recognized and reflected the Defendant’s crime of this case, the fact that there is no criminal history of the same kind of crime, the victim saws the Defendant first and uses violence against the Defendant, and the victim’s damage is relatively heavy, etc. However, the lower court did not reach an agreement with the victim. In light of the sentencing factors favorable to the Defendant, the lower court appears to have sentenced to reduced punishment compared to the summary order, taking into account the sentencing factors favorable to the Defendant, and taking into account all the sentencing conditions of this case, such as the Defendant’s age, character, character, environment, the background and consequence of the instant crime, the circumstance after the crime, etc., it is deemed that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.