상해등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal: (a) In relation to the crime of insult in the judgment, the fact that the Defendant did not injure the victim, but did not injure the victim, and the injury of the victim’s satise, tensions, tensions, etc. is not caused by the Defendant’s act, not by the Defendant’s act, but by the operation of the satum drive, etc. during several years; and (b) in relation to the offense of insult in the judgment, the Defendant pointed out that the Defendant continuously dumped satts on the Defendant’s side house during that period, and criticizeed the victim, even though the Defendant did not take the same bath as the Defendant’s criminal facts, the lower court erred in matters of mistake that found the Defendant guilty of all the above two crimes.
2. Determination
A. As to the assertion of mistake of facts as to the crime of injury in the judgment, the Defendant did not inflict injury upon the victim for two weeks of medical treatment on the ground that the victim was pushed down or spawd, etc., but did not go beyond the floor. However, on July 2, 2011, the Defendant was under interrogation by the police, and the Defendant was under interrogation by the victim's shoulder with the wall, and was under inspection on the part of the defendant's blue part of the left blue with the wall, and there was no memory on anywhere how the victim was faced, but was under inspection on the right shoulder and left flue part, and accordingly, the Defendant was stated to have suffered injury at the right shoulder and left flue part. Accordingly, the Defendant's body and the victim was required to submit the written diagnosis of the victim's body and the written diagnosis of the victim's body at the place where the victim suffered injury (the victim's body and the victim's body were in need of temporary treatment.)