The defendant is a person subject to a call for military force mobilization training.

Although the Defendant received military force mobilization training conducted in the name of the head of the Seoul Regional Military Affairs Administration from June 13, 2017 to June 15, 2017 by the 60 association 162 from June 13, 2017 at around May 10, 2017, the Defendant did not enlist on the above date without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a written accusation (including a list of trainees called for training and inquiries about domestic registration);

1. Article 90 of the relevant Act on criminal facts, Article 90 of the Military Service Act on the Selection of Punishment, and Selection of fines;

1. A fine not exceeding 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the first offender, the fact that there are circumstances to consider the defendant's failure to enlist in the military, and the fact that the defendant has undergone supplementary training conducted after the defendant, etc. that he does not repeat again) of the suspended sentence;