If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

1. Defendant A: (a) around 23:04 on January 24, 2020, at the Defendant’s residence located in Macheon-si Building C; (b) around 112, the police officer affiliated with the Macheon-si Police Station E box called “I would have to confirm and confirm only personal information as he/she is a family member, file a petition; and (c) while verifying his/her personal information, he/she himself/herself carried the two shoulders of the above G, which were written in front of the Macheon-si.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

2. At around 23:08 on January 24, 2020, Defendant B, at the place indicated in the preceding paragraph, she took a bath to raise complaints about the arrest of the above A as a flagrant offender, and the police officer affiliated with F, such as the security guard assigned to the police box of the Pocheon Police Station Emba, deemed the Defendant to have “responding and sitting,” and he saw the Defendant to have the h face of the above H, and was sleeped with the f’s epith.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement of G, H, and F with each police record of 112 reported cases, an investigation report (facam image verification) on the list of reported cases, and attached documents - Application of the facam image photographic Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant B, who committed an act of assault and intimidation against multiple public officials who perform the same official duties as prescribed in Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act, multiple crimes of obstruction of the performance of official duties are established according to the number of public officials who perform official duties. The above acts of assault and intimidation were committed in the same opportunity at the same place, and thus, if the act of assault and intimidation is assessed as one act under the social concept, multiple crimes of obstruction of the performance of official duties are in a relation

Supreme Court Decision 2009Do3505 Decided June 25, 2009