The defendant is the 23 Dong representative of the Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Council of Residents' Representatives.

The Defendant, the chairman of the council of occupants' representatives of the above apartment C, without disregarding the opinions of the above representatives of the apartment complex, was dissatisfied with the fact that he was selected as the above apartment management company and is in charge of the management business, and offered with D, E by reducing the equipment and materials necessary for the management business located in the above apartment management office. On February 23, 2012, at the above B apartment management office around February 23, 2012, at the above B apartment management office, two computers for the above apartment management accounting, one of the manager's books, and one accounting documents, etc. were transferred to the above apartment management office to the above apartment management office and prevented the above entrusted management company, which is the above entrusted management company, from reading and using the above computer and accounting documents, thereby interfering with the apartment management affairs of the above company by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol law to C

1. Article 314 (1) and Article 310 of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. A fine not exceeding 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (50,000 won per day);

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the defendant reflects his mistake and that the defendant has no record of criminal punishment, in addition to the fine due to traffic accidents);