beta
(영문) 대전고등법원 2017.09.28 2017누11426

부당해고구제재심판정취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal, including the part arising from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the dismissal of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Then, the 2nd 11th 2nd 2nd 2nd 1st 2nd 3rd 8th 8th 3rd 8th 3rd 8st 3rd 8st 3rd 8st 4th 4th "from May 26th 2015, the 2015 last 2nd 3th 4th 5th 5th 6th 6th 2012 "the 5th 5th 6th 5th 6th 5th 6th 6th 5th 6th 6th 6th "the 5th 6th 5th 6th 6th 6th 7th 6th 7th 6th 7th 6th 7th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th "the 9th 6th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th " the 8th 1st 8th 1st 8th 8th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 7.".

On August 2015, the Plaintiff appears to voluntarily engage in the business and record it, rather than on the one hand.