except that the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[criminal records] On November 13, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud and two years of suspended sentence, and on September 22, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to three months of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud at the Suwon Giwon Giwon Giwon Giwon Giwon Giwon Giwon Giwon Giwon Giwon Gibag, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 7, 2018 (the termination of the execution of the detention house sentence on October 2, 20

[Criminal facts]

1. Crimes against the victim B;

A. On June 30, 2016, the Defendant, by defraudation of KRW 50 million with respect to C Borrowing Site, is a parking lot as part of an urban planning project promoted by Seoul Metropolitan Government by September 2017, in the office of “Co., Ltd. E” for the operation of the 3rd floor of the 3rd floor of the Seoul Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Building site, to the victim as a parking lot.

The owner of a house is allocated a long-term lease apartment, which is sold by the Seoul Housing and Urban Corporation (SH), 33.

At present, the down payment is being held in the state of paying the down payment for five bonds, and the down payment will be transferred in double three bonds if it is paid up to 50 million won.

“.....”

However, in fact, it was difficult to know whether the project for the development of the parking lot site, such as the expropriation of the parking lot site, was actually carried out. In the process of simply examining the development of the parking lot around July 2015, FJ had completed the review of the project due to the lack of business feasibility, etc., and since around 2012, it was necessary to make a partial repayment of the development project investment or loan money from many creditors by the method of “return prevention” because it was impossible for them to pay the development project investment or interest, principal, etc., and the change was needed. Therefore, even if receiving the money from the injured party, there was no intention or ability to allow the injured party to obtain the compensation or the right to occupy a long-term rental apartment, even if it was paid by the injured party.

The defendant is to pay 20 million won in cash from the damaged person on his/her job, and 30 million won in cash from H bank account in the name of G, his/her father or mother on the same day.