A. At around 02:00 on September 13, 2013, the Defendant, at the main point of “D” located in Northern-gu C at the port, inflicted an injury upon E in need of medical treatment for 14 days, by setting up against the victim E in opposition, making the flaps, making the flaps, making the flaps, making the flaps, and cutting off the flaps, making the flaps, and flapsing the flaps.

B. The Defendant, in the circumstance of e, the wife of E, who was attached E in order to arbitrate the dispute at the above time and place, flicked with E, and flicked with E, and flicked the body length of the victim E out of the main point that the victim again occurred, and flicked the body length of the victim E in two descendants, thereby causing the victim to undergo medical treatment for 14 days.

2. The defendant's assertion and defense counsel's assertion that there was no injury to the defendant's victim or his/her defense counsel due to the victim's injury.

3. Determination

A. The establishment of facts constituting an offense in a criminal trial ought to be based on strict evidence with probative value, which leads a judge to have a reasonable doubt, insofar as the prosecutor’s proof does not sufficiently reach the extent that such conviction would lead to such a conviction, even if the defendant’s assertion or defense is inconsistent or unreasonable, it should be determined in the interests of the defendant, even if there is doubt of guilt, such as the defendant’s assertion or defense is inconsistent or unreasonable.

B. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances, evidence submitted to this court and duly admitted alone is insufficient to acknowledge the facts charged, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

1 The victim E was in a state of being satisfed at that time and did not accurately memory, and there is doubt about the credibility of the victim E’s statement because the victim F was aware of the contents of the case from the victim F on the following day of the occurrence of the case, and even according to the victim E’s legal statement, it is accurate when the victim F’s brain satisf occurred for any reason.