2. The lower court determined the sentence by taking into account the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant led to the confession and reflect of the instant crime; (b) the first offender was not recovered for more than three years from the date of the crime; and (c) the victim was suffering from considerable economic suffering after the instant crime; and (d) other factors of sentencing as indicated in the instant records and pleadings, including the degree of deception, the amount of deception, the amount of deception, the relationship between the Defendant and the victim, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and the circumstances after the crime.

Even when considering the circumstances alleged by the Defendant as the grounds for appeal, the lower court appears to have determined the punishment within a reasonable scope, sufficiently taking into account all the circumstances regarding sentencing.

Furthermore, there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances to change the sentencing of the lower court after the lower judgment.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act because the defendant's appeal is without merit.