2. In the instant case, although the Defendant used violence against a police officer in the performance of official duties, the Defendant’s primary crime is against the Defendant’s depth, the degree of assault is not severe, and the Defendant’s contingent crime is a crime committed in the course of training women’s fluorial behavior, and other various sentencing conditions indicated in the record, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, and circumstances after the crime, should be considered comprehensively, it cannot be deemed that the lower court’s punishment was too unfluent and exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

Therefore, prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.