However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The defendant and the victim B(n, 35 years of age) are marital relations.

1. On August 10, 2020, the Defendant causing property damage: (a) at the Defendant’s house located in Suncheon-si, C apartment, and D around 22:10 on August 10, 2020, on the ground that the victim does not open a door to change the front door password and open the door door door password; (b) thereby damaging the front door door door of the market price that is the joint ownership of the Defendant and the victim; and (c) damaged the Defendant’s and the victim’s joint ownership by causing a storm of 50,000 won at the market price that is equivalent to 80,000 won.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property.

2. The Defendant suffered special injury, at the time, at the time, at the place, as described in paragraph 1, and on the said grounds, was able to sprink the wind, which is an article dangerous to the victim, and was inflicted on the victim, by drinking the face of the victim, by taking about about four weeks of treatment, and by taking the victim’s face into consideration.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. B Written statements;

1. 112 Reporting case handling table; and

1. A report on internal investigation, report on internal investigation, and investigation report (on-site investigation related to damage to property);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts and the choice of punishment;

1. Within the maximum term of imprisonment with prison labor for the crimes under the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Judgment on the defendant's assertion under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act

1. The summary of the Defendant’s assertion is that the Defendant, rather than the victim, was faced with a storm by facing the wall, and the wind is faced with the face of the victim.