2. Although there are circumstances that can be considered in light of the circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant recognized the instant crime, the fact that the area of the land illegally filled out by the Defendant was not small, the Defendant had the record of having been punished by a fine as to the same kind of crime, equity with the criminal punishment as to other crimes similar to the instant crime, and other criminal sentencing conditions as to the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the instant crime, circumstances after the instant crime, etc., the above sentence of the lower court cannot be deemed to be too unreasonable, and the above argument by the Defendant is groundless.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.