However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 18, 2015, at around 23:56, the Defendant entered the Cheongju Police Station D District Unit of the Cheongju Police Station located in the Cheongju City City, which is the issue of taxi engineer and charge, and “I see that I am dypine due to dypine. I am dypine. I am dypine’s name. I am dypine’s name. I am dypine’s name. I am dypine’s name. I am dypine’s name. I am dypine’s fypine’s fypine. I am dypine’s fypine’s fypine, and dyp, etc.’s fypine’s fypine, and fyd’s fypine’s fyp.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the maintenance of public order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol to G and F

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Basic area (from June to April) of category 1 of the obstruction of performance of official duties, the scope of the recommended sentence on the sentencing criteria;

2. Determination of sentence was rendered around 2010 and sentenced to a fine of five million won as a crime of robbery and injury, as well as the fact that there were several occasions of punishment, such as being sentenced to a crime of violence, reflectiveness, the degree of violence is not serious, there is no record of being punished as a crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, and other factors of sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Act are comprehensively considered to be determined as the sentence.