beta
(영문) 대법원 2016.01.28 2015도9460

재물손괴

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the judgment, the court below was just in maintaining the judgment of the court of first instance which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case on the grounds that the act where the defendant well paid the top of the pine trees of this case constitutes a crime of destruction, and that such act cannot be deemed as an urgent escape or a justifiable act, and contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations in violation of the law of logic and experience, or by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations in violation of the law of free evaluation of evidence, or by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations in relation to the crime of damage to property, or by failing to exhaust all the legal principles as to the object of the crime of damage, damage, intent of damage,

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.