At around 03:40 on March 14, 2013, the Defendant was assaulted by the victim D, who had been a member of a trade union, on the ground that the Defendant assaulted G as a member of a trade union, due to the previous problem of the trade union before, and against this, the Defendant saw the victim's face in his hand, and put the victim's face at approximately five times with drinking and hand, and spawn dump, etc. requiring treatment between approximately two weeks to the victim.

2. There are statements made by the victim D, medical certificates submitted by the victim, and photographs that are flicked in the victim's item to be admitted as evidence that seems to correspond to the above facts charged.

However, unlike the contents of the prosecutor’s written statement in the investigative agency, the victim reversed the statement to the effect that “the defendant must return to the first-half return from the defendant” in this court, and the contents of the statement were embodied and added to the new facts when the statement was made several times in this court.

In particular, the victim stated in the court to the effect that the victim was given her her her buck with regard to the time when the victim met with the defendant at the first time. However, according to the contents of the voice file which recorded the situation at the time of the occurrence of the instant case submitted by the victim, not only the fact that the victim and the defendant unilaterally assaults the defendant, but also the fact that the victim was aware that the victim unilaterally assaults the defendant, the fact that there was a her buck with the victim, has not been revealed.

In addition, in the court, the victim saw the victim from the defendant as her seat and her seat "on the left side" in his/her hand, but it is contrary to the investigation report that the police at the time of the investigation was red.

On the other hand, the victim is able to keep the victim at the court.