업무상횡령
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant has served as the C President of the school juristic person C, D as the secretary of the above school juristic person, and E as the president of the F University under the above school juristic person.
On May 8, 2012, G was investigated by the investigation department of the Gangseo-gu branch office of the Chuncheon District Prosecutors' Office on May 14, 2012 and was prosecuted on August 21, 2013 and was convicted of violating the Higher Education Act at the Gangnam branch office of the Chuncheon District Court, and appealed on August 27, 2013. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 24457, Aug. 21, 2013>
1. The Defendant and D’s occupational embezzlement Defendant and D, on June 7, 2012, managed or controlled the accounting affairs of C, and kept corporate accounting funds in the course of business. D, around June 7, 2012, recommended the Defendant, the president of the board of directors of the above school juristic person C to pay the expenses for appointment of an attorney-at-law in criminal cases of violation of the Higher Education Act by the president of the F University E, and approved the Defendant.
D ordered H, who is a school juristic person C accounting officer, to pay for the lawyer's fee of 5.5 million won from the corporate accounting fund in relation to the criminal case against the above Higher Education Act.
On June 7, 2012, H withdrawn 5,500,000 won from the corporate accounting fund and remitted 5,500,000 won to the account of the law firm I.
Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with D, embezzled 50,000 won from corporate accounting funds.
2. On September 3, 2012, the Defendant and D’s occupational embezzlement Defendant and D, who managed or controlled the accounting affairs of C, have kept corporate accounting funds in the course of business. D, around September 3, 2012, recommended the Defendant, the president of the board of directors of the school foundation C, to pay the expenses for appointment of an attorney-at-law in a criminal case against the Higher Education Act Act of the F University Department G, and approved the Defendant.
D. Accordingly, D.