except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 9, 2013, at around 01:24, the Defendant arrested D as a flagrant offender with respect to the case of insulting D in the C District located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and prepared a document using the name of pro-friendly E in order to conceal his/her personal information, and stated that the document is “E” in the column of the confirmation of the above document, and submitted a false signature to F Assistant, a police officer in charge of not knowing the forgery.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged and exercised his signature in the name of E without authority.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of written confirmation;

1. Article 239 (1) and Article 239 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act of the relevant Act concerning facts constituting an offense (a point of exercising a false investigation and signature at the time of the market);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act for the reason that the suspension of execution is more than that of the suspect examination as soon as the real name of the person is indicated in the process of interrogation of the suspect.