업무상과실치사
The judgment below
Of the defendants A, the part of the defendant is reversed.
Defendant
A The summary of the judgment of innocence shall be published.
1. At the time of 2014, the facts charged in the instant case E was the second-year doctor in the first medical department of the hospital located in Seocho-gu Seoul (hereinafter “instant hospital”). Defendant B was the first medical department of the instant hospital and the second-year doctor in the first medical department of the instant hospital. Defendant A was the first medical officer of the first medical department of the instant hospital; Defendant A was the person in charge of the first medical department of the instant hospital; the victim F (the south, the age of 52 at the time) was the patient with the difficulty in respiratory and was the patient who was within the first medical department of the said hospital.
On March 21, 2014, at around 21:34, the victim applied to the emergency room of the above hospital with a pulmonon rate. At around 22:23, E, who was employed in the emergency room at the time, was found to be acutely acute hepatitis, after examining the victim at around 22:23, the victim provided oxygen through a line and mountain hexa, administered dex trixa hand and hnmina, which is a drug that easing the part of the breathe patient, and completed the X-ray shooting for the breath part, but it is difficult to conduct accurate diagnosis (the complainant filed a complaint, but it is difficult to find the breathitis easily due to the experience of the second resort, and requested immediately to inform the superior of the situation and assist him of the situation, etc.).
Defendant
B, while examining the symptoms of the victim, after receiving a report from E on the symptoms of the victim, diagnosed the victim without viewing the victim's verbal diagnosis records, diagnosis car and X-ray photographs, and requested the defendant A, who is the person in charge of the emergency room, to help the victim.
Defendant
A, upon receiving a report on the symptoms of the victim from Defendant B, the victim was examined without viewing the victim’s medical records, diagnosis car and X-ray photographs, and conducted three times with Defendant B, but did not find any surrounding structure. The victim’s oxygen map was reduced to 92% around 22:34 and 89% around 22:50, and 48% around 22:50.