The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the lower court, the lower court is justifiable to have determined that the lower court convicted all of the facts charged of forging private documents as of January 5, 2012 among the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds stated in its reasoning, including forgery of such private documents, the use of such private documents, the use of securities, forgery of forged securities, the fraudulent entry of the original of a notarial deed, the use

In so doing, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the credibility of a witness’s statement, the principle of trial on evidence, the principle of trial-oriented trials, the principle of substantial direct and psychological examination, the probative value of evidence to be found guilty in a criminal trial, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine as to legal errors

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.