However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 12, 2013, the Defendant opened a key "D" in Suwon-si Ctel 705, Suwon-si, the Defendant: (a) placed an advertisement on the Internet E site in order to recruit female employees; (b) conducted interviews against women suffering from contact; and (c) conducted interviews against men and women, such as dialogues, kis, and chests; (d) paid 40,000 won per customer; and (c) recruited female employees from the time to November 16, 2013 to the time of recruiting female employees; and (d) assisted female employees to engage in commercial sex acts by guiding female employees to a smuggling room with 60,000 won, who had female employees, in lieu of taking a sexual organ of their sexual intercourse.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the pocket book;

1. Article 19 (2) and (1) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of Imprisonment with labor concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. Probation, order to provide community service and attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act, Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: One month to seven years of imprisonment;

2. The scope of the sentencing guidelines for sentencing [decision of types] the basic area of the arrangement of commercial sex acts (decision of the recommended area and the scope of the recommended punishment] by sexual traffic crime group-business, etc. (no special person shall be punished for six months to one year):

3. The sentence shall be determined as ordered within the scope of the recommended sentence, taking into account the fact that the Defendant’s decision of sentencing is divided, and that it is the first offender who has no criminal power for punishment, etc.