2. The judgment of the court below is a condition for sentencing favorable to the defendant, including the part that the defendant was denied in the court below, and all of the crimes of this case are against the defendant, and the defendant has no record of punishment exceeding the fine before the crime of this case is committed.

However, the crime of this case, as a multi-household manager, threatens the victims who live in a multi-household as dangerous things, and attempted to intrude into the residence even though the victims who live in a multi-household, and the nature of the crime was very poor, taking into account the fact that the defendant did not receive an application from the victims up to the trial, and other various circumstances, including the defendant's age, character, character, environment, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment of the court below is too unreasonable, and thus, the defendant and his attorney's allegation of unfair sentencing is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.