beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.05.18 2015가단5128847

소유권이전등기

Text

1. The defendant is against the plaintiffs:

A. Attached Form 1. Map No. 8, 9, 10, 26, 27, 28, 29, 29, 30.3 of the Seoul Jung-gu D Forest land No. 1190 square meters

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

(a) Expropriation of the land for creation of F 1) The Defendant shall display only the lot number G of Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as the “road number”).

(2) On June 19, 2008, the Central Land Tribunal accepted 1190 square meters of D forest land owned by the plaintiffs on July 2, 2010 and 2175 square meters of forest land E on September 10, 2009, respectively, for the purpose of the F Development Project. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 22347, Dec. 30, 2010>

3) As to D on February 25, 2010, July 13, 2010, the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer on October 5, 2009, October 13, 2009, and October 16, 2009 as to E forest land due to a consultation on each public site. (b) Jbyra’s land possession 1) K and 4 other on the ground.

JBL was created to the west of the F.

2) Of the 1190 square meters of D forest land, attached Table 1. Of the 1190 square meters of land for D forest land, the part (1) and 46 square meters inboard (hereinafter “D land”) connected each point of 8,9,10,26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, and 8 shall be attached in sequence.

3) Of the land size of E forest land 2175 square meters, the part (1) on the ship connected in sequence to each point of the attached Table 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 20 and 14 of the Map No. 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 14 of the Map No. 2, and the part (2) on the ship connected in sequence to each point of the attached Table No. 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 21, and 28 of the Map No. 2.

4 The Plaintiffs agreed to sell D land used by the Plaintiffs as the entrance and receive 32 square meters of an apartment newly constructed after reconstruction, between the head of the association and the head of the association, who promoted the re-building of J Borrowing on September 16, 2004.

Since then, reconstruction procedures were suspended.

C. The Plaintiffs’ administrative litigation is against the Central Land Expropriation Committee, etc., using D’s land as JJ access roads, and E’s land as a land within JJD’s fence, and thus, requesting revocation of the adjudication of expropriation.