2. The nature of the crime is bad and the liability for the crime is heavy in consideration of the facts that the method of the crime is planned in intelligence, the fact that the crime is large, and the amount of damage is large.

The victims of embezzlement did not agree with the victims, and the victims of embezzlement complained of the defendant's criminal act in this case that the transaction with Cambodia was difficult due to the defendant's excessive transaction.

However, in full view of all the sentencing conditions in the records of the instant case, including the fact that the Defendant is recognized as committing a crime, and is against the law, that there is no domestic criminal record, that considerable amount of damage to the crime of embezzlement has been repaid, that is, the agreement with the victim of the crime of fraud has been reached in the trial, and that all the sentencing conditions in the records of the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, and the circumstances before and after the crime,

Therefore, the prosecutor's improper argument of sentencing is not accepted.

3. The appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is dismissed on the ground of appeal.