2. The fact that the defendant's mistake recognized the victim's injury, except the victim K, appears to have been returned to the victims, and that the amount of damage caused by the crime of this case is not much much than 2.530,000 won in total.

However, in light of the circumstances that are disadvantageous to the defendant's age, character and behavior, occupation and environment, motive and background leading to the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime of this case, etc., the court below's punishment is too unreasonable, as it is not acknowledged that the defendant's assertion is too unreasonable, since it is not reasonable in light of the following factors: (a) the same crime is repeated in the course of being tried due to the theft crime; (b) the victims did not agree with the victim until this court; and (c) the previous records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, occupation and environment; (d) the motive and circumstance leading to the crime of this case; and (e)

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.