A. The defendant does not have inflicted any injury on E.

B. The misapprehension of the legal principle is merely self-defense inasmuch as the misunderstanding of the legal doctrine merely knew E while avoiding the death and drinking of the Defendant, and thus, she constitutes self-defense.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, ① the defendant 1 was raising a chickens in part of the land cultivated by his mother in Daegu Suwon-gu from June 2012, ② the defendant's punishment E cultivated over the above land, ② the defendant's punishment E damaged the fruit trees, etc., and caused her mother's humbrity in his property, ③ the defendant and E were in dispute over the issue on July 27, 2012, ③ on the issue that the defendant and E puts the me about the me about the mecirth, and the fact that the defendant was over the A floor by being pushed over several times, ④ the defendant reported about the 112 immediately thereafter, and the defendant's movement and kneethm in the photograph taken at the time, etc., and thus, the defendant's allegation that the above facts of injury could not be acknowledged in full view of the above facts.

B. As to the assertion of misapprehension of the legal principles, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, namely, ① the defendant stated that “the defendant was “Isn't know the cat of the Scat of the Scat of the Scat of the Scat of the Scat of the Scat of the Scat of the Scat of the Scat of the Scat of the Scat of the Scat of the Scat of the Scat of the Scat of the Scat of the Scat of the Scat of the Scat of the Scat of the Scat of the Scat of the Scat

감정이 격해져서 E의 어깨를 밀치니까 형도 밀리지 않으려고 약 30미터를 밀치며 실랑이를 하다가 같이 넘어져 바닥에 뒹굴기도 하고 E가...