A. The status of the parties is that the defendant is a doctor who operates the Csung Foreign Medical Center (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant Council member"), and the plaintiff is a person who has undergone an operation from the defendant.

B. On November 4, 2010, the Plaintiff was recommended by the head of the Counseling Office to extend and melting the Plaintiff’s crypology, crypology, crypology, crypology, balpology, crypology, and balpology to improve the appearance of the Plaintiff’s crypology with his/her motion picture player.

On November 9, 2010, the Plaintiff decided to undergo one time the four types of surgery recommended by Defendant Council members, and received an open non-co-marization, oral mouth reduction, liquid fluoral enlargement, liquid fluoral expansion, and fluoral local transplantation.

(hereinafter “instant surgery”). C.

1) On July 12, 2011, the Plaintiff: (a) at the Defendant’s Council member, expressed the complaint that the upper right chest is likely to lower the shape; (b) the Defendant requires a re-operation on the Plaintiff; (c) the lower part of the Plaintiff is necessary to do so; and (d) the lower part of the chest was able to look at and protect the chest.

B) The Plaintiff, as the Defendant’s instructions, provided medical treatment, but the name and pains were continued on the left and right bank. On September 23, 2011, the Defendant Council member received an extension and re-operation of the protection of the protection of the protection of the human body. On July 2013, the Plaintiff complained of the pain bank name and the right bank’s pain, and applied to Defendant Council members for the re-operation of the protection of the human body. As the result of the CT shooting, the results of re-operation were diagnosed that the construction of the Gu type (the re-operation of the universal body inserted into the bank on the ground of emulsion, blood transfusion, infection, infection, etc.) was necessary. The Plaintiff received an operation to correct the transformation of the location of the anti-presidential body and the location of the anti-presidential body on April 3, 2014. Meanwhile, the Plaintiff was found to have undergone a re-operation on the ground of the establishment of the tissue reaction, etc. on the ground of the establishment of the co-pon.