Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Each article written in the facts charged by the Defendant’s summary of the grounds for appeal (hereinafter “the instant notice”) explained the Defendant’s “D” (hereinafter “victim”)’s employees to return to I, the Defendant’s wife. The above J did not see the Defendant’s child’s gate or allow the Defendant’s son to write a gate on the teaching material by using it, and without considering the distribution structure, stated that the victim sold 200,000 won goods to KRW 19.80,000 without considering the distribution structure, and the Defendant, who unilaterally written the instant notice, had the victim’s employees, etc. under the conciliation of the “Voluntary Dispute Mediation Committee”, was aware of the falsity or the purpose of slandering the Defendant’s identity. Thus, the judgment of the court below that acquitted the Defendant of the facts charged of this case is erroneous by misapprehending the legal principles, or by misapprehending the legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.