A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a maximum term of two years and a short term of one year and six months.

The prosecutor asserts that the sentence imposed by the court below (two years and six months in prison, and two years in prison) is too unhued and unreasonable, and the defendant asserts that it is rather unfair.

Judgment

The defendant led 24 occasions in the short period of two months to commit a joint crime. Some of them are highly poor in the quality of the crime and the circumstances that were committed by robbery, injury, or injury to the aged victims by force, and are not agreed with the victim H, L, AA, and AC up to the present day, confession and divided into disadvantageous circumstances and crimes, such as the fact that there has been a record of being subject to protective disposition and suspension of indictment due to the theft-related crimes, the victim E and P agreed at the court below, the victim E and P agreed at the court below, and the first head of the court of the court below's judgment on the Special Act on the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (special rape) and the latter concurrent crimes under Article 37 of the Criminal Act. The defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the defendant's assertion that the defendant's punishment was unfair, and thus, the prosecutor's assertion that the defendant's punishment was unfair, is without merit.

As the appeal by the defendant is well-grounded, the judgment of the court below shall be reversed in accordance with Article 364 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the following decision shall be rendered again.

Criminal facts

The summary of evidence is identical to each corresponding column of the judgment of the court below, and thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Application of Statutes

1. The point of injury resulting from robbery under Articles 337 and 30 of the Criminal Act, which is applicable to a crime;