beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.10.12 2018고단1505

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for up to seven months.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. On July 27, 2016, the Defendant leased only KRW 20 million to the injured party B a preferential loan within the Defendant’s car located on the road adjacent to Ulsan-dong, Chungcheongnam-gu, Ulsan-do, Ulsan-do, Seoul-do. The Defendant is obliged to pay taxes from the company in the future.

Money is to receive money from the customer two months later, so it will be paid without money.

And we will loan money to find employment and make it easy to find employment in a company that operates on the face of a week with the help of finding employment.

“A false representation was made.”

However, fact that the defendant was operated

C was closed ex officio due to the unpaid tax in 2009, and was thought to use the money borrowed from the injured party as a security deposit and cost of living. Therefore, even if the injured party borrowed money, there was no intention or ability to pay the money.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and was transferred to the post office account (D) in the name of the defendant under the name of the victim for the same day from the victim.

2. On August 9, 2017, the Defendant, within a passenger car of the Defendant located on the road adjacent to the Southern-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-do, Seoul-dong, the Defendant lent the victim “a loan of KRW 6 million to the lack of office rent. The Defendant, at present, was able to file an application for a loan with the Small and Medium Business Administration, will

That is, it shall be paid with the money borrowed in front without the mold.

In addition, it is possible to find employment in our company because it is prepared to find employment.

“A false representation was made.”

However, the Defendant did not operate the company as described in Paragraph 1, and was thought to use the borrowed money for monthly rent and cost of living, so there was no intention or ability to repay the borrowed money from the injured party even if he borrowed the money.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and belongs to it.