The judgment below

In light of the records, it is just that the court below affirmed the judgment of the court of first instance that acquitted Defendant A on the ground that the facts charged in this case against Defendant A and the facts charged in this case against Defendant B were occupational embezzlement, occupational embezzlement, use of private electronic records, and use of private electronic records, etc. is not proved of facts, or is not a crime. There is no violation of the law of logic and experience and the principle of free evaluation of evidence, or misapprehension of the legal principles as to the use of private electronic records, etc., contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

On the other hand, the prosecutor appealed the remainder of the judgment of the court below, but there is no specific grounds for objection as to this part in the petition of appeal or appellate brief.

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.