beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.01.20 2014가단109440

채무부존재확인

Text

1. Bsch Rexton around 09:00 on May 13, 2014 in the vicinity of the Calna direction in the area of the Calna in the outer cycle road of Seoul.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. A. On February 2014, the Defendant entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with the Plaintiff, which provides for the Car Compensation I, II (100 million won limit), property compensation, automobile injury, non-life insurance, self-motor vehicle damage, etc. with respect to Bexton II vehicle (hereinafter “instant vehicle”), and entered into a limited driving special terms (hereinafter “instant special terms”) with the Defendant and his spouse, who are the named insured, as follows: (a) the Defendant and D’s spouse’s spouse’s limited driving special terms and conditions; and (b) the limited driving special terms and conditions (hereinafter “instant special terms and conditions”).

The insured and the spouse's limited driving special terms and conditions shall not be paid insurance money for any accident occurred while the insured and any person other than the spouse are driving the insured motor vehicle in accordance with this special terms and conditions.

However, I would like to pay insurance money for the damage of the insured motor vehicle first, the personal injury second, the personal injury, the self-physical accident, the injury of the motor vehicle and the security for self-motor vehicle damage caused by the insured motor vehicle accident from the time of theft to the time of discovery.

B. On May 13, 2014, the Defendant E (F) who was on leave of absence during military service, was on board five son-gu, 09:00 on May 13, 2014, and was driven by the instant vehicle, and was driven by a driver of the instant vehicle to the right side of the C3.5 tons away from the left side of the c3.5 tons cargo vehicle, which was parked on the right side of the instant vehicle, due to the negligence of driving the instant vehicle to the high-sea and to the side side of the route, and caused the instant traffic accident by four son, including the Plaintiff, and two son, and the driver of the victimized vehicle.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without any dispute, Gap's 1, 5, Gap's 6-1 through 8, the purport of the whole pleadings, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s allegation that the instant traffic accident is not a registered insured person, the Defendant, and his spouse, and E, the Defendant’s children, obtain the Defendant’s consent.