손해배상(자)
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
1. On March 13, 2017, Plaintiff A driving an unregistered 50cc (c) Oralob on the 12:43 March 13, 2017, leading to the intersection in front of the H of the Gyeonggi Pyeong-gun, leading to the intersection in front of the Gyeonggi Pyeong-gun, and was in the middle of the intersection in front of the solar terminal.
On the back of the above Obane, I, the spouse of the plaintiff A, was aboard.
Plaintiff
When A enters the above three-distance intersection, the red signal was displayed on the signal apparatus installed in front of the plaintiff's proceeding direction.
Plaintiff
A has stopped in accordance with the foregoing red signals, changing a two-lane to a two-lane and continued to enter the intersection.
이때 원고 A의 진행 방향의 오른쪽에서 좌회전 신호에 따라 좌회전 중인 J이 운전한 K 메가트럭버큠로리 화물차량(이하 ‘이 사건 차량’이라고 한다)의 좌측면 부분(운전석 하단 발판 부분)을 오토바이의 앞부분으로 충격하였다
(hereinafter “the instant accident” refers to “the instant accident”). The instant accident led to the instant accident, and I died at the instant accident site, where I was on the back part of the instant vehicle, where I was on the back part of the lower part of the instant vehicle, while having been on the back part of the west part of the west part of the front part of the instant vehicle.
Plaintiff
B, C, D, F, and G are children of the above network I.
[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1-5, 8's evidence 345678935, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The plaintiffs' assertion and judgment
A. The gist of the plaintiffs' assertion is that J, a driver of the instant vehicle, has a duty of care to confirm whether or not the vehicle enters the left-hand side while attempting to turn to the left-hand turn, without confirming it. The driver of the instant vehicle enters the intersection without confirming the existence of the vehicle. The head of the deceased, who was away from the front-hand seat of the Plaintiff A, was over the rear wheels by failing to immediately stop the instant vehicle immediately after the collision with the Ortoba that driven by the Plaintiff A.