성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(13세미만미성년자강제추행)
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant and the victim B (the family name, the female, the 10 years old) are neighboring residents of the same apartment, and the road is passing, and the victim is about the degree of personnel of the defendant.
피고인은 2019. 2. 8. 15:40경 용인시 기흥구 C아파트 정문에서 우연히 만난 피해자가 인사를 하자 피해자에게 악수를 하자고 하여 악수를 한 후 집으로 가는 피해자를 따라가 피해자가 거주하는 동 1층 엘리베이터 앞까지 간 후 그 곳에서 피고인을 발견한 피해자가 다시 인사를 하자 피해자에게 따라오라고 하여 같은 아파트 옆 동 D호에 있는 피고인의 집에 피해자를 데리고 들어가 거실에서 과일을 깎아준 후 갑자기 피해자에게 다가가 양쪽 팔뚝 부위를 잡으며 “뽀뽀 한 번만 해 주라”라고 말하며 뽀뽀를 하려고 하였으나 피해자가 싫다고 말하며 책으로 피고인의 입을 막자 위 행동을 멈췄다.
Accordingly, the defendant attempted to commit an indecent act by compulsion against the victim under 13 years of age.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Stenographic records;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (related to the first statement of a victimized child), (related to the recording of statement), and ( concurrently CCTV investigation);
1. Relevant Articles 15 and 7 (3) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and Article 298 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;
1. Article 25 (2) and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of attempted crimes;
1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing):
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following consideration shall be made again for the reason of sentencing);
1. The Defendant under the proviso of Article 21(2) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse is deemed to have been unable to normally perform an order to attend a lecture due to the deterioration of recognition function due to Albts’ illness. Therefore, a special circumstance where the Defendant is unable to impose an order to attend a lecture on him.