2. Although the defendant did not report to the head of the Gu and operated a livestock product sales business for a relatively long-term period, the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects it, the defendant appears to have been supplied with a crypter to the seller without additional processing and manufacturing (29 pages of evidence records). The defendant's immediate report was duly made to the competent authority as soon as he was controlled by the crime of this case, and the defendant was crypted for the local child center, such as the circumstance of the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, etc. The defendant's punishment of the court below is too unfair, and the prosecutor's assertion is without merit, since it is too unfair, considering various sentencing conditions shown in the argument of this case, such as the circumstances of the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and environment, etc.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.