However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. At around 10:40 on December 10, 2012, the Defendant: (a) stolen the victim’s door-to-door “E”, which was operated by the victim C in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, with a set of 180,000 KRW 180,000, market price owned by the victim, which was displayed at the front of the entrance of the victim in a cresh in which the victim’s surveillance was neglected.

2. At around 11:00 on January 4, 2013, the Defendant: (a) cut off one set of booms equivalent to KRW 100,000, market price owned by the victim, which is displayed at the front of the entrance of other parts of the said victim’s surveillance negligence; and (b) one set of booms equivalent to KRW 22,00, market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A written statement;

1. Records and lists of police seizure;

1. Investigation reports (related to damaged goods);

1. Each investigation report (Submission of a suspect's written agreement), and (Report accompanied by CCTVTV images-fashion photographs);

1. Photographs;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing CCTV images;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (an aggravated punishment for concurrent crimes as provided for in larceny of January 4, 2013, heavier punishment of concurrent crimes);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 333(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the victim's return to the general property [the decision of a punishment] thief [Special Convict] - Reduction and exemption area [the decision of recommendation area] mitigated area / [the scope of recommendation area] 1 to 6 months / [the range of general stief] mitigation area / reflectd reflectd amount of mitigation element - double repeated crime not falling under aggravated factors - previous and previous and previous and (less than 10 years after completion of execution] applicable provisions / statutory punishment under Article 329 of the Criminal Act for the victim's return to the general property [the range of punishment] applicable provisions: 1 to 6 months: Additional punishment for concurrent crimes containing a single sentence of imprisonment: 1 to 6 years: 1 to 6 years (whether suspended execution is suspended] major reasons: