When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On August 1, 2008, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1 million as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act from the Ulsan District Court on August 1, 2008. On September 10, 2009, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2.5 million as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act from the Daegu District Court's Ansan Branch on September 1, 2009.

Although the Defendant violated the prohibition of drunk driving, at around 07:02 on May 12, 202, the Defendant driven C Aridia5 car in the state of drunk alcohol concentration of approximately 0.052% from the area of approximately 2 km in the same city of ancient city from the parking lot of macro-si to the mountain mountain mountain village in the same city of ancient city from the parking lot of 07:02.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Notification of the control of drinking driving;

1. Judgment division: Application of criminal records, reply reports, and copies of summary order Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty for a crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground of sentencing of the provisional payment order is based on the following factors: (a) details leading to driving under the influence of alcohol in this case; (b) details leading to criminal punishment for the same kind of crime committed by the defendant; (c) but has long history of criminal punishment for the same kind of crime; and (d) the fact that