손해배상(자)
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
1. The Plaintiff is a person driving a B-CRV passenger vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), and the Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the C-B vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”). There is no dispute between the parties.
2. The parties' assertion
A. Although the driver of the Defendant’s vehicle should have taken all necessary measures to prevent collision with the Plaintiff’s vehicle by discovering, driving or temporarily stopping the vehicle by bypassing the Plaintiff’s vehicle, the Plaintiff caused an accident involving the front left-hand part of the Defendant’s vehicle with the front-hand part and the front-hand part of the front-hand part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle. The Plaintiff paid KRW 35,200, 3,066,027 for medical expenses, and KRW 1,550,613 [3,101,227 [3,00,00 won for repair of the Defendant’s vehicle 3,06,00 won for treatment expenses) x50,613 [3,50,000 won for repair of the Defendant’s vehicle 35,00 won for treatment expenses x50% x 50%].
B. The defendant's assertion that the defendant's vehicle was driven normally on the third line, and the plaintiff's vehicle that was bypassed from the back side of the accident point during the temporary stop due to the pedestrian signal at the front of the accident point is an accident that occurred due to the plaintiff's total fault since the plaintiff's vehicle that was bypassed from the back side of the accident point is not connected to the fourth line, and the defendant's vehicle was exposed to the third line
3. On August 15, 2015, at around 15:11, 2015, the Plaintiff moved back from the back road located between E and F mobile phone agencies located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to the fourth line road of Do road in order to go into a wooden distance, and the Ho Dong-dong border border also fell into the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle, the front side of the right side and front wheelchairs of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, which was straight along three-lanes from the intersection to the front side of the front left side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and the fact that the Plaintiff fell into the front side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, or that the written statements or images of the evidence No. 1 through No. 7, No. 1, and No. 2, and all pleadings are all made.