If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The Defendant is the representative of the director-specialized company “B” and is the owner of the C-private truck.

Although the owner of a private-use truck is not allowed to provide the truck for the purpose of transporting the truck for a fee, the defendant, at around 12:20 on June 3, 2013, using the above private-use truck in Suwon-gu D apartment 212 dong 1004, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, for the purpose of transporting the object of E to 102 dongs in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and received KRW 750,000 from the above E for its transportation

Accordingly, the defendant provided private cars for cargo transport at a cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. E statements;

1. Photographs of vehicles;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (Evidence No. 45 pages);

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 67 subparagraph 5 and 56 of the Trucking Transport Business Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing grounds of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the provisional payment order are against the Defendant, the circumstances of the instant case, the profits acquired by the Defendant, etc. are considered. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds above.