If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The Defendant, at the Gunsan Branch of the Jeonju District Court on July 18, 201, has been punished by a fine of KRW 1.5 million due to a violation of Road Traffic Act (driving under influence), and the same year.

9. On June 16, 201, the same court was sentenced to a fine of three million won due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving), and a fine of five million won due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Jeonju District Court on June 7, 2013, respectively.

However, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol level 0.121% in blood, and around September 7, 2017, at around 00:12, the Defendant driven B Poter truck within the two kilometers of approximately two kilometers from the front day of the restaurant in front of the U.S. in front of the U.S. in front of the U.S. in front of the U.S. in front of the U.S. to the front day of the U.S. in front of the same Eup/Myeon.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Application of an inquiry letter, such as criminal history, and an investigation report (to file the same paper of force) statute;

1. Article 148-2 of the Road Traffic Act, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, the selection of a fine, and the selection of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act in the order of provisional payment is the fact that the defendant had been punished for a fine due to a multiple driving of drinking, and the driving of drinking at once, even though he had been previous conviction, and that the police was controlled by the police after being reported that he was diving on the road at the time of driving at the time of driving at this case: Provided, That the fact that the defendant is currently under probation, the age, occupation and living environment of the defendant, and various circumstances such as alcohol concentration and driving distance during blood at the time of crackdown;