beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2019.09.17 2019고정389

사기

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The name-disscamist committed the act of deceiving victims and ordering other investigators to commit the crime by falsely speaking that “the bank account under the name of the party has been used as the one for the use of the one for the one for the other.” The Defendant, upon the introduction of the Defendant’s friendship B, conspired with the above name-disscamist using the ID called “D” through the “C”, after having known the above name-disscamist of the fact-conscing, he would receive a proposal from the above name-disscamist and receive part of the money received in cash from the above name-disscamist who received the said documents used as the Financial Supervisory Service.” The Defendant conspired to receive the money from the above name-disscamist and the one for the use of the name-disscam scam as an allowance.”

1. On June 14, 2018, at a place where it is impossible to know at least 10:00, the person under whose name the person under whose name the account was false means to the effect that “The G Bank in the name of the party, or H Bank Account, withdraws all the money in the passbook to verify whether he/she is suspected of being used in the I Fraud case, and return to the Financial Supervisory Service employees after checking on his/her name,” and the Defendant was issued KRW 4.54,00 from the victim under the direction of the above offer and direction of the person under whose name the name the victim was in his/her name, around 13:00 on June 14, 2018, as if he/she were the victim or an employee of the Financial Supervisory Service.”

Accordingly, the defendant acquired the property of the victim in collusion with the above-mentioned person.

2. On June 14, 2018, the person under whose name the person under whose name the case is unknown is phone called to the victim L and misrepresented to the prosecutor of the Seoul Western District Prosecutors' Office, and "in order to confirm whether the G bank passbook in the name of the party was established and used for the crime, and is not the victim.