교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 3.5 million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Punishment of the crime
On December 13, 2019, at around 16:54, the Defendant, who is engaged in driving the SM6 car, driven the said car and driven it into one lane from the side of the E apartment to the F apartment.
Since a crosswalk is installed on the front side, there was a duty of care to temporarily stop in front of the crosswalk in order to prevent accidents, so that the driver of the vehicle is well able to live well in the front line, to accurately operate the steering direction and brake system, and not to obstruct the passage of pedestrians or to endanger them.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded with the victim G (the age of 12) who dried the crosswalk as the wheels of the car.
Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury due to the above occupational negligence, such as the proposal of approximately three weeks of medical treatment, and the influence of the detailed part.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. A written statement of the G production;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a homicide and a diagnosis certificate;
1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (6) of the Act on Special Cases concerning Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. The fact that the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order does not comply with basic traffic regulations, the occurrence of accidents occurs, the criminal agreement is not separately made, and the defendant has a relatively recent history of criminal punishment due to traffic accidents: Provided, That it appears that some of the circumstances where it is difficult to find the victims exist, and the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account all of the sentencing conditions such as the defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances after the crime, etc.