2. The judgment of the court below is recognized that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and is in depth and reflects on the fact that the defendant was running the illegal game room, and the number of the game machine was relatively small to 14, and that the defendant's son and his son want to find the defendant's wife against the defendant, but the defendant again committed the crime of this case despite the fact that the defendant had been sentenced to the same previous punishment around 2009, and the illegal game room business has serious social harm such as causing home wave because the defendant was placed at the disadvantage of the game, but there is a need to strictly punish the defendant as it is not easily eradicated despite continuous control, and there is a need to strictly punish the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and result of the crime, and various sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the situation before and after the crime, etc., it is too inappropriate to determine the sentencing of the court below, and it is too inappropriate to deem it inappropriate.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.