The Defendant, from March 1, 2006 to February 29, 2012, served as nursing officer at the D Hospital, etc. located in Sejong, from March 1, 2006 to February 29, 201, was entitled to access the national defense medical system, electronic records of public offices, to enter information in the nursing record book.

At around 10:44 on March 17, 2008, the Defendant reported to the effect that “F hospitalized due to cathere, etc., was in need of forced urology” from a medical hospital E, who was at the time on duty, and instructed E to take compulsory urology without the military doctor G’s instruction at the time, and accordingly, H’s urology had been discharged by means of inserting 1,200c urology by accessing the national defense medical system and inserting 1,200c urology in the nursing record.” In response to the national defense medical system, the Defendant entered false information to the effect that “F hospitalized due to cathere, etc., was in need of forced urology because of cathere, etc., which was in his/her service,” and had the system where false information was recorded from that time.

In this way, the defendant forged electronic records of public offices and exercised them for the purpose of interfering with administrative affairs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness I, E, and F;

1. Copies of each prosecutor's office and police interrogation protocol regarding G;

1. A copy of each police statement made to I and E;

1. A copy of the nursing record book, a copy of the prevention of proceedings, and a copy of the transitional record (Evidence Nos. 5, 16);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on written judgment;

1. Occupation of the relevant legal and electronic records related to criminal facts: Occupation of the event of an electronic record for a forgery of a perjury under Article 227-2 of the Criminal Act: Articles 229 and 227-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a sentence;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act is that the Defendant denies the instant crime, this is due to the lapse of a long period of time.