난민불인정결정취소
The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and the purport of the appeal are the judgment of the first instance.
1. The reasons why the court of this case cited in the judgment of the court of first instance are the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in the following cases:
It shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Litigation Act.
Section 4 of the first instance judgment, "No. 6 of the first instance judgment" is deleted unless the threat was reached at the consent or implied reduction of the Indian government.
No. 4 of the judgment of the first instance court, "No. 7 conduct" does not constitute grounds for recognition of refugee status under the former Civil Act.
It is clear that the reason for recognition of refugee status under the former Civil Code, that is, race, religion, nationality, status as a member of a specific social group, or political opinion, does not fall under the reasons for recognition of refugee status under the same Act.
The term "ro-friendly" is changed.
Part IV of the judgment of the first instance court is "B" Party "B" D (E; hereinafter referred to as "C Party").
2. Conclusion, the first instance judgment is justifiable.
The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed for lack of justifiable grounds.