beta
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2015.12.16 2015가단8377

사해행위취소 등

Text

1. The gift agreement concluded on July 10, 201 between the Defendants and D with respect to each of the 1/2 shares of the real estate listed in the separate sheet is 24.

Reasons

1. Indication of claims: It shall be as shown in attached Form; and

2. Applicable provisions of Acts: Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);

3. The part dismissing the Plaintiff is seeking revocation of the entire contract of each gift constituting a fraudulent act. However, if it is impossible or considerably difficult to return originals, the obligee can cancel the fraudulent act and seek compensation for its equivalent value within the scope of the joint collateral value of the object of the fraudulent act within the scope of the preserved claim. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s claim for revocation of the fraudulent act beyond the scope of compensation for value is without merit.