If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. Around September 30, 2009, the Defendant forged a private document and entered “E”, “F”, “F”, and “H” in the column of contact address column in the column of the name of the subscriber by using an authorized color pen in the paper of the application form for mutual assistance kept at the D superior office located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter of application for mutual recognition in the name of E, a private document on rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and place as described in paragraph 1, exercised the application for a forged mutual aid agreement with I, who was aware of the forgery, as described above, as if it were a document duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. Each police statement made to E and I;

1. Application of statutes on contracts;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;