However, the above sentence shall be executed for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Defendant A, in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, driven CT 100 Oral Ba, and Defendant B driven D Cost Star Corma.

Defendant

A A A A On May 16, 2017, the Defendant driven the above 10:00 on the 10:00, and got the front of the F Real Estate in Seogu, Daegu to cross the crosswalk from the G to the F Real Estate.

Since there are lots of pedestrian traffic on the crosswalks where signal lights are installed, the driver had a duty of care to proceed along the right side from the center of the road rather than the crosswalks.

그럼에도 피고인은 이를 소홀히 하여 위 횡단보도를 따라 진행하고자 진입하였고, 보행자신호의 녹색 신호에 진입하자마자 바로 보행자신호가 적색신호로 바뀌었으나 오토바이를 탄 채 그대로 횡단한 과실로, 위 오토바이의 뒷부분으로 때마침 위 횡단보도 정지선 앞에서 정차하여 대기하다가 교통신호의 변경으로 출발하려던 위 스타렉스 승합차의 우측 앞 범퍼 부분을 충격하여 위 오토바이 뒷좌석에 동승하고 있던 피고인의 처인 피해자 H(여, 54세)이 튕겨 도로에 전도되게 하였다.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the death of the victim due to the above occupational negligence at the J Hospital located in the Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, where the victim was under medical treatment at around 13:07 on the same day.

B. Defendant B’s above

1.(a)

When driving the above van at the time and place indicated in the port, and driving the 3rd line and the 4rd line along the 4rd line from the distance of scattering to the distance of KTNm, the vehicle signal was stopped in front of the crosswalk, but the vehicle signal was changed to the green signal.

At that time, the pedestrian signal of the crosswalk was installed, and at that time, the pedestrian signal of the crosswalk was changed to the red signal to the green signal.